Home
fashion_piranha
26 August 2008 @ 08:32 pm
Discussion Question: Do you read every book in a series?  

I've been trying to write a review all night but I just ain't got it today, so we're going to have a discussion instead.  Sometimes I prefer those anyway; it's fun to read the sheer variety of responses.  Tonight's question is pretty straightforward:

Are you a series "completist?"  
That is, if you've started a book series will you finish it?  
And if so, is there a diminishing scale?  


Like, if it's really good you'll finish it but if it's only so-so you won't?  
Or if the series is slowly sliding downhill but you REALLY REALLY liked the first few books, do you keep reading in hopes that it will pick up again?

Do you wait until a whole series is released or will you read them individually as they come out?

What's a series you really loved?
What's a series that really "jumped the shark" but you just kept reading it?

One of my favorite books (possibly a top 10 contender, definitely in the top 50) is On A Pale Horse by Piers Anthony.  It's the first book in his Incarnations of Immortality series.  It follows a young man named Zane as he assumes the role of the Grim Reaper after accidently shooting his predecessor.  It's pretty darn funny.  But the next volume of the series, which certains on the incarnation of Time, is awful.  The third book (Fate) is pretty good; the fourth volume (War) was one of the lamest, dullest things I've ever read.  I almost gave up after that.   The next two books, which dealt with the incarnations of Nature and Evil were pretty good - Evil's story was almost as good as Death's book - and the conclusion, which kinda dealt with the Incaration of Good (God) without ever actually touching the character, sucked balls.  The fact that I kept reading after fourth book (At the moment, I honestly can't remember the title of the book) is a pretty strong testament, in my mind, that I am a definite series completist.  (Also, the fact that I will eventually read Breaking Dawn also provides good testimony.)

What about you?

 
 
fashion_piranha
24 August 2008 @ 10:27 am
(TSS) Women of the Bible: Abigail's Story by Ann Burton  
 
Abigail’s Story
By Ann Burton
 
            Abigail is another semi-anonymous woman from the Bible, found in the pages of 1 Samuel. (Read the NIV translation here.) While David is on the run from King Saul with his army he asks a wealthy man named Nabal for provisions; Nabal refuses. David is infuriated and decides to attack in retaliation; it is only the quick thinking of Nabal’s wife Abigail that saves the household. She rushes to David armed with gifts and soothing words, begging him to spare them not because her husband’s house is good or worthy but because a man so close to God, as David is, would not something so petty on his glorious record. David is so taken by her wise words (and smoldering good looks; Abigail is described as beautiful) he calls off his soldiers, and when Nabal dies ten days later (most mysteriously…) he marries Abigail.
 
            I believe Abigail’s Story is meant to be the first book in Ann Burton’s Women of the Bible series, but chronologically she comes after Rahab, Deborah and Jael. Since we know so little about these women, Burton has far more creative license than, say, a historical fiction writer working on a book about Anne Boleyn or Marie Antoinette. So in her version of the story, Abigail becomes a girl whose family has fallen on hard times. When her brother incurs a debt her family can never hope to repay, Abigail offers herself to Nabal as a wife instead. After quite a bit of bargaining, Nabal eventually accepts. After a single night of marriage (that the two of them fail to consummate) Abigail is shipped off to a distant hut to inventory Nabal’s flocks of sheep. She has quite a challenge ahead of her: her husband hates her, her servant dislikes her, the shepherds are hostile, she doesn’t know how to do the task at hand, and there are thieves, angry soldiers and wild animals everywhere.
 
            Abigail is a bit too good to be true. I mean, yes she is a character from a Bible but that hardly means she’s going to be perfect. But Abigail is portrayed as a sweet, kind woman that everybody loves (except for her brute of her husband) because she’s so thoughtful and good-hearted. Fine. Burton also mentions several times that Abigail is plain, nothing special to look at; that seems at odds with the Bible’s proclamation that she’s beautiful, praise the Bibles’ authors rarely bestow. She’s a virgin, because the marriage is unconsummated, so when she accidentally meets David and falls in love she’ll be untouched by another man. (Never mind that David has at least two other wives; these are not mentioned in Burton’s story. I bet Abigail’s in for a surprise.)  
 
            The book also has a few scenes of bodice-ripper-worthy romantic almost-couplings (it’s a Christian book, after all) and cheesy dialogue. But the minor characters are interesting; Abigail’s sweetness is contrasted nicely with the acid tongue of her servant and the dry wit of Bethel, the wife of the shepherd in charge of the whole sheep-watching enterprise. If I had read these books in the intended order, and picked up Abigail’s Story first, I definitely would not have continued on to the rest of the series. It’s a fast read but it’s not good, and I don’t feel it captured the Abigail of the Bible. 
 
 
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
23 August 2008 @ 02:15 pm
Creepers by Joanne Dahme  
Creepers
By Joanna Dahme
 
            The copy of this book that I received has an endorsement on the back from Mr. Goosebumps himself, R. L. Stine. Since I grew up reading his goofy horror in elementary school, I regard him with a certain fondness and took his praise of the book to be a very good sign. 
 
            Courtney O’Brien and her parents just moved to Murmur, Massachusetts. At three hundred years old, their new home is local history, and comes complete with its very own graveyard. But even creepier than the moldering headstones is the omnipresent ivy growing on the sides of the house. The weird plant gives Courtney the heebie-jeebies; it grows supernaturally fast and is spreading everywhere. At times she could even swear it is following her as the vines rapidly expand into the adjacent graveyard. But that’s not the only odd thing. Their new neighbors, Christian Geyer and his daughter Margaret, give tours of the graveyard while doing research into a mystery that involved one of their ancestors, a girl named Prudence whose body disappeared from the graveyard many years ago. It is the Geyer’s goal to find the missing coffin and bury Prudence with her father. In addition to lack of evidence (all the Geyers have to work with is an ancient diary that they believe belonged to Prudence’s father and a mysterious woman they call ‘the witch’) the Geyers (and Courtney, who soon joins them on their quest) are thwarted by the town’s plans to move the graveyard so that they can develop the land. Their mission is now twofold: save the graveyard and find Prudence.
 
            The O’Brien family has absolutely no background. It’s strange and jarring. Never once does Courtney, our narrator, talk about her old life in her hometown, the friends she left behind or the experiences of her past. I may simply be unable to recall it, but I don’t think it’s ever stated why the family moved in the first place. For the convenience of beginning the story, they’re deposited in a new place with little fanfare.
 
            There’s a lot going on in the story. At times, the various plot threads become as tangled as the ivy, but the story remains highly predictable. There was one especially irritating factor, though. One question in my mind from their first introduction was Who are the Geyers? The story hints that they may be ghosts, may be somehow supernatural, may just be a pair of weirdos. Although Dahme manages to wind up all her other storylines, this question is never properly answered. The simplicity of the storytelling style, as well as the lack of excitement in the plot (it’s very straightforward A-happened-then-B-happened, no sudden ghosts jumping out of closets or violence or anything startling) and the lack of character depth makes this book seem marketed to a much younger audience than the “teen” readers the book marketing seems to be striving for. I’d recommend this book for second grade through maybe fifth grade? Whatever age group is currently reading Goosebumps, to go back to Mr. Stine. Although Creepers lacks the humor, sudden plot twists, and genuine weirdness of Stine’s classic series, I’d say some kids may enjoy Dahme’s debut novel. But overall? Eh. Meh. Skip it.
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
21 August 2008 @ 06:24 pm
My Husband's Sweethearts by Bridget Asher  
My Husband’s Sweethearts
by Bridget Asher
 
            Lucy Shoreman always knew her husband was popular with the ladies, but four years into their marriage she’d expected him to give up the skirt-chasing ways of bachelorhood. When she discovered his flirtations with a woman Lucy knew only as ‘Springbird’, she was more than a little upset. When dear Artie cheerfully revealed there’d been two other affairs in their post-wedding years, Lucy’s rage skyrocketed and she left him without hesitation.
 
            That was six months ago. Artie is now dying and Lucy must return home and care for him. The first night back they fight, leading Lucy to demand why she has to be the only one to deal with Artie’s bad times when she had to share the good times with all his lovers? Artie challenges her to call his ‘sweethearts’ and invite them over, and in a huff Lucy storms out. Several drinks later, however, Lucy warms to the idea and begins dialing Artie’s old sweethearts to schedule their deathbed appointments.
 
            The very next day they start showing up. There’s Elspa, a former druggie utterly devoted to Artie because he saved her life. Elspa’s polar opposite Eleanor also arrives. She hates Artie passionately and came specifically to make him miserable. Then there’s The One Who Became A Lesbian After, The Russian, The Sign-Language Stripper, The Mother + Daughter Set…as the parade of exes marches on Lucy begins to reconnect with her husband and bonds with some of the other women, but will she be able to forgive him before the Grim Reaper becomes Artie’s final visitor?
 
            My Husband’s Sweethearts is hilarious. There’s silly chapter titles (Chapter Twenty-One: Eavesdropping is an Undervalued Life Skill) and the book reads quickly; it’s perfect to read all in one go or in short, ten minute intervals so it is a wonderful “emergency” book to carry around for bus rides and poolside reading. The dialogue is witty and the characters are just wonderful. Each one has a different reason for being in Artie’s life, and for coming back to see him now.   It’s a playful book with some truly poignant moments. Chick-lit for non chick-lit readers. (hmm…now that I think about it, I’m not sure I’d call it chick-lit, to be honest.)

Click here to buy this book or add it to your wishlist.
 
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
19 August 2008 @ 07:42 pm
Tan Lines by J. J. Salem  
Tan Lines
By J. J. Salem
 
            In the interest of full disclosure and honesty I have to admit that “beach thrillers” aren’t my usual book of choice. I do live in California, so obviously beach reading is an essential summer activity, but I’ve never touched a Jackie Collins book and Sophie Kinsella does absolutely nothing for me.   But there was a lot of buzz surrounding Tan Lines so I thought, why not? I’ll give it a shot. 
 
            There’s a lot going on in Tan Lines, a novel focusing on three friends vacationing in the Hamptons one steamy summer. First there’s Billie, a rock star struggling to keep her star on the rise. Her love of sex and drugs fits her bad girl image perfectly, but it’s also ruining her career.   But at least she has a career. Poor little Kellyanne went to Hollywood to be a movie star but couldn’t get her career off the ground so she’s been reduced to playing mistress for a wealthy businessman and waiting tables. Liza is Kellyanne’s polar opposite; a media darling whose biting wit and fashionable feminism has made her millions. Her current crusade is against a movie called Watch Her Bleed, a slasher flick in which all the women are strong and successful - and by the end of the movie, all of them have been brutally murdered. Liza finds this anti-women message appalling, and she wants the world to know.   The women rent a place in the Hamptons together, but things spiral out of control as fashion and passion collide in a miasma of sexy fun time. We know there was a murder – this is revealed in the prologue – but who gets killed?
 
            Sigh. Like I said, this isn’t normally my genre, so my reaction may be a bit extreme and off the mark. Also, if you were planning to read this book the next few paragraphs may be pretty spoiler-riffic, so feel free to skip them. Just click on the cover of Tan Lines up there on the right and you’re good. Now that the warning is out of the way, this is definitely the WORST BOOK I’VE READ THIS YEAR. I’ll dissect why I thought it was awful for each of the three main characters:

            This was just a terrible read. Even the cover art is atrocious. In this one case, please, judge the book by its cover.
 
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
17 August 2008 @ 11:39 am
Update on Neil Gaiman contest + author interview  
Two updates/announcements for you:

1.   The Neil Gaiman contest has been extended until August 31st, 2008, so keep on spreadin' the good word and have fun with it!

2.  I will be interviewing Tom Davis, author of Red Letters: Living a Faith That Bleeds about his book and charity work in Africa.  Many of you brought up excellent points in your comments, such as:
- Writing the book from a faith-based initiative alienates potential readers
- Throwing money at Africa isn't really helping, or Good intentions vs. smart charity

 and I wanted to hear how Tom would respond to these valid points.  If you have any questions for him (and I hope that you do!), please let me know through the comments or e-mail so I can be sure to include them during the interview!

Also, several people wanted to know if proceeds from the book go toward charity.  The answer is yes: each book sale feeds an orphan for a month through the Children’s HopeChest ministry, and right the Coca-Cola Foundation is also matching the donations.
 
 
fashion_piranha
16 August 2008 @ 01:33 pm
When We Were Romans by Matthew Kneale  
When We Were Romans
By Matthew Kneale
 
            Lawrence is just your typical nine-year-old with a fondness for astronomy when his world is suddenly flipped upside-down. His mother, convinced that Lawrence’s father is stalking herself and their two children, bunkers down in her house and avoids the outside world. When even this doesn’t seem enough, she uproots Lawrence and his little sister Jemima from their home in England and takes them to Rome, the city she met her husband in while still a girl in college. In Italy they’ll start over, she thinks, and begin a new life free from worry and fear.
            At first things seem to be going well. Many of her old friends are still in Rome and greet her warmly, even inviting the little family into their homes. She finds a job and the children start taking Italian lessons. Lawrence learns about Roman emperors and whenever there is time, they go sightseeing. Soon, they’re even able to move into a little flat of their own. Unfortunately, the troubles that drove them out of England follow them to Rome and son they are in hiding once more. 
 
            Did you like Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time? If so, you may enjoy this book. Both stories are told through the eyes of a child, involve a bit of a mystery, and tend to info-dump on the narrator’s favorite topics. Matthew Kneale and Mark Haddon both utilized the child’s voice, a stream-of-conscious, unpolished narrative. I did not care for Curious Incident, but I could appreciate that the book itself was solid, just not to my taste. When We Were Romans, however, is no Curious Incident, so no such allowances on my part can be made.
            I think the main problem is that Lawrence’s story lacks certain grounding in reality. That is, this child doesn’t sound authentic.    Kneale tries to copy the spelling style and grammar errors of a nine-year-old, but he overdoes it. Third graders, inexperienced as they are with writing, don’t spell the same word three different ways in a single paragraph, especially not with the frequency Laurence does. In fact, it doesn’t seem like he can spell any large or “difficult” word consistently. Once or twice this device might be effective and quaint – grossly misspelling the Italian Lawrence overhears was quite cute – but as a constant factor it’s distracting and annoying. Lawrence also never tells us why he’s writing it all this down. It’s written in the past tense, so it isn’t a diary. But the way the writing’s done, he can’t be much older than he was when the events take place.   So what was the trigger?
            Children are often self-centered so some selfishness can be forgiven, and a certain obliviousness to the rest of the world allowed, but Lawrence is a brat. His mother seems to be raising her children with the “be-good-and-I’ll-buy-you-a-treat” school of parenting, so I suppose he can’t be blamed completely. We only meet the adults superficially, and Lawrence does little to reveal their character in his memoirs, since adults aren’t important to him unless they provide him with food or gifts. As a result there’s a void of interesting people, and this added to the appalling spelling and run-on paragraphs put the story on rocky ground. With a superior plot we could overlook these problems as part of a flawed narrator experience, but the plot is so predictable that you’ll guess the “big twist” by the time you’re halfway through.  
 
            I really can’t think of anyone to whom I’d recommend this book. No matter how you look at it When We Were Romans just doesn’t stand out. There are better books about living in Italy, better books told by a child confronted by a mystery, and better books with unusual narration styles.
 
 
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
15 August 2008 @ 09:21 am
Dali & I: The Surreal Story by Stan Layryssens  

Da & I: The Surreal Story

by Stan Lauryssens


Salvador Da was a strange, brilliant man. His famous face, with trademark gravity-defying pencil mustache and perpetually bugged eyes, is instantly recognizable. Dalí created some of the most haunting and bizarre images of the 20th century while living the topsy-turvy life of the ultimate attention whore. (Really. Paris Hilton and her like have NOTHING on this guy.) If something was strange, if something was perverted, if an act would surely make society flinch, Dalí did it.


Dalí and I chronicles the story of two men: the artist in his declining years and the unscrupulous art dealer Stan Lauryssens. Stan specializes in Dalí; it is all he sells to his wealthy clientèle. This is not due to artistic snobbery, for Stan readily admits he knows nothing about art, but through a perfected sales pitch – BS of the ripest order – he has gained the reputation as the man to see if you want to buy some Dalí.

Unfortunately, ever since Dalí discovered the fine art of screen-printing, it's almost impossible to find a genuine Dalí. By the mid-1970s, when Stan begins his dubious career as Dalí expert, there are hundreds of prints circulating, and it is rumored that Dalí spends his entire day signing blank pieces of paper. The artist's insatiable love of money has trumped his paintbrushes and artistic vision, save for one thing: Dalí does not have a consistent signature. He signs each painting or print in a different style, making it extremely difficult to authenticate his works. How can one tell if a print of The Persistence of Memory is from Dalí or some random crook out to make an easy buck? Is Dalí creating art, or is it just a scam?


Well, scam or not (and although he paints himself as innocent and trusting, it's pretty obvious the author knows he is dealing in fakes) Stan is soon in hot water. It's that precious sales pitch that he used to sell his prints: “A British investment magazine has calculated that the art of Salvador Dalí has gone up 25.94 percent per year between 1970 and 1975, and that's only for starters. When Dalí dies, prices will skyrocket.” Well, confound it all, Dalí is just refusing to kick the bucket, and Stan's clients (many of them with sketchy connections, to put it mildly) are getting antsy for the huge profits they were promised. It's an investment, after all. The market's getting flooded with cheap prints of Dalí's art and the authorities are beginning to suspect Stan of art and mail fraud. What else can he do but flee straight to the hometown of Dalí himself, and hideout next door to his famous neighbor?


This hilarious autobiography of Stan's mad scramble to survive and escape the world of art and Dalí is often as ludicrous as the artist's creations. “What is a real Dalí?” Stan asks, but to answer that question must first answer “Who was the real Dalí?”and the stories he shares from Dalí's servants, associates, friends and lovers do more to fortify the artist's mythology than reveal the man behind the name. Since the book was released there have been a few critics about it's authenticity – Stan is a man who did eventually go to jail for fraud, after all! - but it's fun. It's worth the read just for Stan's ridiculous sales talk and the cameos of some of the hottest artists from the 60s and 70s. But a serious study of the artist this isn't; was mysterious Salvador Dalí an artist genius cashing in on society's insatiable desire for his work, or a mastermind scamming the entire art world, getting paid without doing a lick of work? Only he and his six-hundred and seventy-nine different signatures will ever know.


A movie of this book is currently in production, with Al Pacino to play Dalí.



 
 
fashion_piranha
14 August 2008 @ 06:20 pm
Discussion Question: Explain your screen name!  
Wow!  Thanks to a little mention on the blog of Mr. Neil Gaiman himself, I have had more folks wander through my journal in the past twenty-four hours than in the previous month.  That's AMAZING.  Thank you, everyone, for visiting!

As I've recorded screen names onto bits of paper (I like to do things the old-fashioned way) and chucked them into a big bucket (I was using an upturned top hat, but you've outgrown it!) I've seen so many variations on familiar themes.   [info]ardentdeleriumand [info]mercydelerium.  Digital.osiris and [info]theladybast.  [info]vivadawolf[info]callwolf, and[info]warwolves.  [info]cookiethief[info]spookycookie27; I could go on pairing usernames all day; I haven't even gotten into the abundance of cat-related nicknames, celestial titles, and usernames that I just can't pronounce.   (This is usually my own silliness kicking in: I keep misreading [info]callingamy as calligraphy.)

Suddenly, there's hundreds of new people reading my reviews.  Great!  But I want to get to know you!  It's no fun talking into a void, but it's wonderful chatting with friends.   So, let's talk!

So, introduce yourself.  Name, book tastes, vital stats.  And answer - why did you pick the username(s) you did?

Right.
I'll go first.  Only fair, right?

So I'm Suzi.   I have always loved the creativity of couture fashion and the way something as simple as a piece of fabric could be twisted and molded around the human body into art.  I majored in fashion design for a while, but aspects of the industry conflict too much with my personal ethics (and I really, trully, passionately hate sewing) so I've switched to art history or business management, depending on whether the desire to make money or the desire to enjoy the rest of college wins.  So [info]fashion_piranha is a tribute to my love of fine clothing and beautiful accessories, and the viciousness of the industry.  Plus, piranhas are cute.  (No, really.  Watch a school of them swim around and tell me they aren't playful little jerks.)

I review books in this blog, covering a wide variety of topics.  Some folks recommend focusing on one genre to better find your audience, but I think that's silly.  It isn't healthy to read only one thing over and over again.  So I try to get a good variety in; in the past month I've read books about overfishing the world's oceans, Salvador Dali, haunted hotels, Abraham the patriarch, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, and a variety of fiction: fantasy, contemporary, historical, and mysteries to name a few.   I read a lot of books on Christianity and Judaism; I'm also looking to expand my knowledge of Islam, Buddhism, and the other major world religions.  I'd say between half and two-thirds of what I read, I blog about.  

When I'm not reading I like to paint and draw.  Sometimes I'll take a poke at my sewing machine, but mostly I avoid that like the plague.  I think writing's a blast and I try to find time to squeeze it in whenever I can.

Thanks for dropping by!  If you have any questions, feel free to ask 'em.  Otherwise - your turn!
 
 
fashion_piranha
12 August 2008 @ 06:38 pm
The Gargoyle by Andrew Davidson  
The Gargoyle
by Andrew Davidson
 
            The Gargoyle was enthralling. I loved it. In fact, this book has become my Favorite New Read of 2008, bumping The Lace Reader from the comfortable throne it occupied since late June. In fact, The Gargoyle may have made it all the way to my Top Ten Ever list, except that I have never bothered the create such a record since I’m pretty sure once I finally settle on ten titles in stone I’d want to shatter it to bits and start all over again. But yes, The Gargoyle was good.
 
            An unhappy burn victim, formerly an Adonis and now hideously disfigured, is plotting his own demise when an enigmatic woman named Marianne Engel flutters into his room and begins telling him stories about a former life in which they were lovers in medieval Germany. She is a temporary mental patient at the hospital, and a sculptress who carves stone gargoyles(and apparently makes quite a bit of money in the process.) Beautiful but almost certainly mad – for how can her stories about living seven hundred years ago be true? – Marianne shares tales of lovers around the world, all joined together only by the strength of their emotions for the ones they care for, while trying to awaken the memories of their past relationship in the burned man (never named), who waxes from almost believing in her stories and complete denial.
 
            The burned narrator would never have pulled out of his suicidal slump without the assistance of a fabulous cast of characters. In addition to Marianne, there’s his perky Japanese physical therapist, his nerdy-and-slightly-awkward psychologist, and strict, no-nonsense doctor, all of whom eventually form a little family for a man and each teaches the narrator a different kind of love. 
 
            The book draws from a vast reservoir of inspiration, from Dante’s Inferno and monastic life in the 14th century to psychology and modern Japanese culture.   The narrator is near obsessive in his quest for information; when he wants to learn about something – for example, mental disorders so he can diagnose what’s wrong with Marianne – he absorbs huge quantities of information and along the way passes much along to the reader. Yet it never feels like an ‘info dump’ – like those awkward conversations frequent in historical novels, where a character will expound on a the history of some object or event in a way that would NEVER happen in reality – only part of the narrator’s journey. The book is simply fulfilling the tagline that was on my cover: All things in a single book bound by love.
 
            One warning: The book can be quite graphic. In the first chapter the car accident that nearly killed the narrator and his horrible wounds are very explicitly explained; I’m quite squeamish normally and it did make me squirm to the point I almost put the book down. But I’m so glad I didn’t. Andrew Davidson’s first book is amazing, and absolutely worth any minor discomfort.
            For those of you who have already read the book, what do you think?
-         Marianne is completely certified crackers.
-         Marianne really is seven hundred years old and needs to refer me to her face cream.     
 
 
 
 
fashion_piranha
10 August 2008 @ 10:13 am
Red Letters: Living a Faith That Bleeds by Tom Davis (TSS)  
Red Letters: Living a Faith That Bleeds
By Tom Davis
 
            In many versions of the Bible, Jesus’ words are written in red ink to emphasize their importance. It brings attention to His words and underscores their urgency.
 
            Red Letters is a call to action, an urgent book calling on Christians to get off their collective bums and return to their roots. In the first and second centuries, Christian groups had a reputation for kindness to the poor, widows, and the downtrodden. But today’s Christians largely ignore a vast population of the suffering: those suffering from the AIDS crisis in Africa. 
            Although written for Christians, Tom Davis’ message is universal to all faiths (and even the faithless): thousands of Africans are dying daily because of disease and starvation. He throws out statistics at a frenetic pace. Children are being orphaned at an alarming rate; they struggle to survive without parents at ages of five and six. For a loaf of bread, a ten-year-old sells her body and risks infection. Most African countries lack the infrastructure and the funding to care for these dying and parentless, even though medicine is more affordable than ever. Misinformation abounds; Davis recalls hearing from men who believe that if they have sex with a virgin, they’ll be cured of HIV. (Uh…WHAT?)   It’s a self-propagating cycle of suffering and misery. 
            Davis wants to stir his audiences’ emotion and sympathy, and he largely succeeds. Indeed, after a few chapters I wanted him to dive right into a “What You Can Do To Fix This Problem” solution manual, but there were many more chapters of depressing, grim facts to read first. Eventually he did share good news: if each of us in wealthier countries started giving just five dollars a month to help those in Africa, we could make a huge difference.   His literature is targeted at Christians, with reminders of Jesus’ call to his followers to be good Samaritans and care for the unloved. However, I think this is really a call to everyone to be the best they can be, and to recall what it means to be charitable. When so many are suffering, and so little sacrifice on our part can make such a big impact, what excuse do Americans have? 
In spite of common protests that it’s all futile, Davis (and Bono, who is frequently cited) believes that we really can change the world. He lays out a plan that he calls 5forFifty. It requests those of us who have been blessed with plenty to:
 
1.      Give 5 minutes a day to pray for those infected by HIV/AIDS.
2.      Give 5 hours a day to fast for those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
3.      Give 5 dollars a month to the Five for 50 Fund and support worthy causes.
4.      Give 5 days a year to travel overseas and help alleviate poverty and suffering.
5.      Give 5 people an opportunity to join you on your journey.
 
Tom Davis’ blog can be found here: http://tomdavis.typepad.com/
            In addition to talking about his book, he writes about his experiences in orphanages in Russia and in Swaziland, one of the areas hardest-hit by AIDS. He often posts video and photographs, and it’s definitely worth checking out.
 
 
Buy the book on Amazon.com, or add it to your wishlist.
.
 
 
fashion_piranha
09 August 2008 @ 03:15 pm
Author Interview: Thorina Rose (The Heartbreak Diet)  
An Interview with Thorina Rose
 
About a month ago, I reviewed a new graphic novel called The Heartbreak Diet. I have since had the wonderful opportunity to speak to the author and ask her a few questions. Here’s what Thorina Rose had to say about the translations of her experiences into pages in a book:
 
 
Q. So The Heartbreak Diet is the autobiographical story of your marriage and divorce after you discovered your husband having an affair. What drove you to share your story with the world? 
During the period when my marriage went pear-shaped (love that expression from across the pond) I would routinely share (probably over-share) not just the sad, but the funny details of my drama with my friends. During one of these marathon sessions, my friend Michael laughingly said to me, "You should write a graphic novel". The proverbial light bulb went off, and in every way the project seemed inspired. As for revealing all, in part I hoped to provide some solace and humor for other women going through a similar misadventure. I learned a lot from my experience, and felt that, despite the pain, it had made me grow. Another more personal reason was as a way to combat the humiliation of being left for another woman. My ex. had, in his stated reasons for leaving, made comments such as, "You used to be creative. You're not creative anymore". The book is my response to that: "How's this for creative, buster?"
 
 
Q. What inspired you to utilize a graphic novel format instead of the more "traditional" full-text novel?
            The answer to this question is a confluence of a couple different factors. First of all, I think that my talents as a writer would be insufficient to carry a traditional prose book. Secondly, I have been an illustrator for many years, and it felt more natural to attempt a graphic novel, as I am essentially a visual person. Also given the vastness of book market (someone recently told me there are 200,000 books published a year!) I felt that my book would be more original, and have a slightly better chance of standing out from the crowd, if it were a graphic novel.
 
 
 
Q. You've illustrated some other books – Lover's Yoga, Animalogies, Office Kama Sutra – but always with another author. How did writing your first novel compare to your previous experiences? Did the lack of collaboration change your approach?
            In those earlier projects, I never collaborated with the author directly, as I was in each case, given a finished, edited tex